Home / For / Life Sciences
For · Life Sciences

The data convinces scientists. It does not yet convince investors, partners, or buyers.

That gap is a commercial architecture problem. The science is real. The translation to investor narrative, partner messaging, and buyer pathway has not been built, and commercial conversations stall because of it.

Built for life sciences and biotech CEOs and BD leaders at post-proof-of-concept companies. Applies to medtech VPs of Commercial, biopharma heads of corporate development, clinical-stage commercial leads, and similar operators translating science into commercial traction.

// Primary gate

Marketing Strategy Diagnostic

Investor narrative, partner-facing messaging, commercial buyer pathway, licensing readiness, 6-month sequencing. Written document your BD team operates from.

$5,000 · 10 business days
Start qualifying →

Marketing strategy for biotech and life sciences companies translates scientific credibility into commercial credibility. The engagement covers investor narrative architecture, partner-facing messaging, commercial buyer pathway for hospitals and distributors, licensing conversation readiness, and 6-month commercial sequencing. Entry is the $5,000 Marketing Strategy Diagnostic delivered in 10 business days.

60%

A clinical-stage medtech company reduced investor deck cycle time by 60% after repositioning the commercial narrative. The science did not change. The translation did.

Representative engagement · Commercial translation
The Gap Unique to Life Sciences GTM

Three translation failures that stall commercial conversations.

Every biotech and life sciences engagement we take on is some combination of these three. None of them are science problems. All of them are architecture problems.

Gap 01 · Credibility transfer

Scientific credibility does not transfer to commercial credibility automatically.

Investors and partners read scientific proof differently than they read commercial readiness. A dataset that reads as definitive to a reviewer can read as early-stage to a distribution partner. The translation is structural, not cosmetic.

Gap 02 · Reference frame

Buyers borrow reference frames from adjacent incumbents, usually wrong ones.

A novel diagnostic gets evaluated against legacy diagnostics because the buyer has no better frame. Your pricing, adoption assumptions, and switching story all get read against a reference class that does not fit. The work resets the frame before the conversation starts.

Gap 03 · Narrative audience

Partnership and licensing conversations stall when the commercial story is not legible to a business audience.

The scientific narrative speaks to one audience. The commercial narrative must speak to another. When the second narrative does not exist, BD and licensing conversations run in circles, and the deal memo never gets written.

What the Work Covers

Commercial translation, not a marketing campaign.

Representative Engagement

Two successful clinical studies. Two letters of intent. Eighteen weeks between them.

A South San Francisco diagnostic company had completed two successful clinical studies and could not close a commercial partnership conversation. The diagnosis: the partner-facing narrative was written for scientists.

Eighteen weeks after repositioning for commercial buyers, two letters of intent from distribution partners. The science was always there. The commercial readability was not.

Diagnostic · Clinical-stage · 18-week timeline
What to Expect

Who does this work, and why it is structured the way it is.

The strategist leading this work, whose broader practice is at stantscherenkow.com, has worked with technical founders on commercial translation for over a decade.

The engagement is structured around written output rather than retainer hours. You receive a strategy document your BD and commercial team operate from, independent of whether the relationship continues. The 10-business-day timeline and the fixed $5,000 scope exist to produce usable documents, not to anchor a retainer.

Biotech cycles are slower than SaaS cycles, and the work accounts for that. The sequencing is 6 months, not 90 days. Partner evaluation, clinical publication, and investor follow-on conversations each run on their own cadence, and the document reflects that reality rather than fighting it.

Fit Check

Who this is built for, and who it is not.

// Good fit

  • Biotech post proof-of-concept with scientific milestones already in hand
  • Clinical-stage medtech preparing for commercial launch or distribution negotiation
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic companies entering partnership or licensing conversations
  • Biopharma corporate development leads building investor or partner narratives
  • CEOs and BD leaders who treat commercial translation as an architecture problem, not a copy problem

// Not a fit

  • Pre-proof-of-concept research spinouts still validating mechanism
  • Academic labs without a commercial entity or BD function
  • Companies looking for tradeshow collateral, website copy, or PR without strategic architecture
  • Operators who want a retainer relationship rather than a scoped strategy document
  • Teams unwilling to subject the scientific narrative to commercial-audience review
What 6 Months Looks Like

The commercial posture at the end of a working cycle.

Qualify for the Diagnostic

Four questions before the Strategy Diagnostic.

The diagnostic is $5,000, delivered in 10 business days. These four questions calibrate the engagement to where your company actually is. All four are required.

// Submission routes to the $5,000 Strategy Diagnostic intake

Where this starts

The science is real.
Build commercial architecture that matches.

Marketing Strategy Diagnostic for biotech and life sciences. $5,000 flat. 10 business days. Investor narrative, partner messaging, buyer pathway, licensing readiness, 6-month sequencing.